Morailty and Law

CRITICAL ANALYSIS

Define Law

Different contries will have different laws

Define Morality

Different cultures will have different views

Consensus of Views

Is there a shared consensus of legal views?

Is there a shared consensus of moral views?

Enforecement

Law is enforced through the use of the criminal law, formal punishment, legal sanctions

Morality is enforced through the use of public expressions of condemnation, ostracisation, denunciation

CRITICAL EVALUATION

Hart/Devlin Debate

The debate over the relationship of law and morality was brought to the fore in the famous Hart/Devlin debate, which followed the publication of the Wolfenden report in 1957.

The report recommended the legalisation of prostitution and homosexuality on the utilitarian basis that the law ‘should not intervene in the private lives of citizens or seek to enforce any particular pattern of behaviour further than necessary’ to protect others.

Diversity

Can the law ever reflect the diversity of moral opinion that exists in a multicultural society such as England?

Provide examples of the range of moral opinion

Ethics

One of the major problems which arises when law attempts to take the above approach with regard to morality. It will consistently change with time, to reflect a change in attitudes, and the law must attempt to stay abreast of the situation.

Provide examples of where the law has attempted to reflect changes in moral views.

Case Studies

There are a range of high profile cases that demonstrate the ambiguous relationship between morality and law. These are....

R v's Brown, 1994

R v's Wilson, 1993

R v's R, 1991

Re A Conjoined Twins (2000) CA

NHS Trust v's Bland (1993), 2WLR 316

COMPARE/CONTRAST

Examples of Law

With Moral Content

Murder, Theft, Incest, Obscenity

Without Moral Content

See R v Kingston (1994), R v Somerset CC ex parte Fewings (1995)

Examples of laws on debatable moral issues

See Gillick v West Norfolk Area Health Authority (1986) –
Airedale NHS Trust v Bland (1993) –
R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority ex parte Blood (1997) –

DESCRIPTION

Definition of Punishment

Provide an official/unoffical definiton

Expressive Function of Punishment

What message are we trying to send on a specific general level when we seek to punish?

Defining features of Punishment

Condemnation and censure

How and Why to Punishment

These are just a few of the many questions surrounding the social institution that is punishment

INTRODUCTION

AIMS

What is the question asking?

OBJECTIVES

How might you answer the question?

CONTEXT

In what context does the question relate to?

CONTENT

What research, studies, philosophies, theories, evidence have you analysed, evaluated, explored, discussed in an attempt to answer the question?

REASONING

What was the reasoning behind these choices?

Main topic

CONCLUSION

Recap

Aim

Objective

Main points of analysis

Main points of evaluation

One of these questions related to: What to punish?

On the basis of Morality?

Or both?

On the basis of Law?

Are Law and Morality ever likely to co-exist?

Not all people are convinced that the law should used to enforce a particular moral code

Law can be seen as the state echoing, and seeking to uphold, these values. These descriptions can be seen to be, however, not entirely correct, and the issue of law and morality is undeniably complex

Morality can be roughly described as a set of values which are normative, specifying the correct course of action in a situation, and the limits of what society considers acceptable.