Was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki a reasonable way to stop the war? (the question is on the docs)
What is the Nagasaki and Hiroshima bombing
On August 6, 1945, during World War II was still happening, an American B-29 bomber dropped the world's first deployed atomic bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Than three days later, a second B-29 dropped another A-bomb on Nagasaki, killing an estimated 200,000 people in both cities of Japan
A better solution was to use different tactic the US could have used to let the Japanese surrender
The Main reason that the US used their bomb because they wanted to stop the war as quick as possible and let the Japanese Men to surrender. I think they could have used a different tactic to stop the war than destroying the cities, giving the cities radiation and polluting it, also killing 200,000 innocent Japanese civilians. Some basic tactic they could have done was wait it out because the Japanese didn't have much men left and supplies, Rush Japan, instead of giving the cities radiation and polluting they could have rushed the city which would have prevent these items that I have listed and also would have been a clam way to attack the cities than destroy the cities with nuclear warfare and killing 200,000 innocent people as well. There are also more ideas that i can add like.... but all of these tactics that I have listed would have been better to do as we know that the nuclear option would have been much worse than the ideas that i have listed as what the nuclear has done to the japan cities and ground
Innocent Japanese Civilians died
During the War there were Japanese citizens living in the country and doing there stuff. When the bomb went off it killed about 200,000 civilians in those cities just in one day and killed more after the radiation was fully exposed to those civilians who were exposed to it. This is one of the most tragic day in Japan as Japan didn't do anything to the US to get bombed in their own country, but mainly had an effect on those two cities of Japan. Civilians lost homes, died, had nothing else during the bombing in those two cities. The government had to pay a lot of money to build the cities and provide for the civilians and do everything as much they could (the government)
Was it good or Bad to deploy the Nuclear Bomb
I personally thing that it wasn't necessary to bomb Japan and doing so it was not appropriate as the war was bout to end, killed innocent Japanese civilians, polluted, radiated and destroyed the Japanese cities. These made me wonder that using/deploying this bomb on Japan wasn't a good idea to bomb japan by looking at these ideas. But if you are looking on the bright side to why the US bombed Japan was to end the war earlier by two to three weeks, but looking at this there wasn't much to the bright side as to how much the US has done damage to Japan and what bad impacts it had to Japan and to the rest of world, but mainly Japan as what the allies have done to the two cities and what mistake they have made developing this bomb.
The War was about to end
Map view/The better income the Allies could have used
Basically what I mean is that I want to show the map view of the war in 1945. In that period Italy was long gone and Germany was just knocked out. The two biggest European country are gone and Japan was left and most of their supply and men were gone so all you had to do was push in Japan and knock it out like Britain and the US did we Germany. But instead you used the Nuclear which done a lot of damage to Japan and put radiation and pollution to the city and destroyed the two cities as well. Why am I using a map to state my point. Good question i am using this map to show and help you understand that how Britain and the US can have done this in a different way which they can waited Japan to surrounded as they were low on supplies and men or attacked Japan instead of polluting the cities and putting radiation as well and also/mainly not killing at least 200,000 innocent civilians which could had a peace and better income if they didn't bomb the cities and used a different situation which could have been better for the two sides (Axis and Allies)
There was only Japan left in the war
In 1945 Japan was only left in the war and the other two countries were knocked out (the European powers). First was Italy, they left the war on May, 2nd, 1944 which were the first Axis team to leave, then it was Germany, they left on May, 7th, 1945 but were knocked out early in November. But how does this relate to the US bombing two Japan cities have an effect? It has an effect as the only thing they had to do was wait or attack to stop the war peaceful and not doing anything bad like polluting, or putting radiation in the cities and killing innocent civilians, I think the easiest way would have been to not nuke the country and use a different strategy to end the war
Created a lot Radiation, Pollution, and destroyed Japan Cities
Radiation
Yes there was radiation in the atom bomb where the two Japan cities where hit. The radiation was strong and powerful that it irradiated the people in japan as there was radiation in the bomb which irradiated the people, also radiation can attack or weaker the humans and animals DNA, this can also damage the humans cells and can be enough to kill them or causing can them to mutate in ways which may eventually lead to cancer. This has affect Japan as people had to breathe into this air forcefully with no choice in the cities and people who were breathing into the air could have died or the could have got cancer breathing into the air or people could have died when they were bombed in the cities with the radiation doing anything to them
Pollution
Pollution is the number reason to how we are starting global warming and changing the climate. Pollution is really bad for the earth and for us, but what the US has did with one bomb polluted Japan's cities and polluted even more. First what they did was they built the bomb which polluted the US area as they used specific items to polluted the area like the factory where they build it items they used to build it, fire, oil and other things you can use to pollute the earth, then droping it on Japan, it created fireball, shockwaves and intense radiation which affected Japan and polluted some parts of japan, also it contaminating air, soil, water and the food supply and did some environmental damage which was destroying Japan cities which also polluted the earth when they build it the first time and would pollute it again the second time by droping the bomb and building the cities all over again
Japan cities
When the bombing happened it basically destroyed Japan's cities, the two of them were Hiroshima and Nagasaki, The US wanted to target the biggest places which was those two cities, by doing so they destroyed the cities even thought the war was about to end within some time like two/three weeks because the resource were low in Japan, the men, food, medicine were low so it would of ended soon and basically not losing anything (The U.S.A) and same with Japan not losing there two valuable cities but supplies yes, but if they have attacked it would have not destroyed many buildings but would have ended the war much more earlier in a week due to the lack of stuff. But overall using a different would have saved the cities than destroying them, but the bomb was used in action and destroyed the cities, created pollution and radiation and also killed civilians which i will be talking about later