Cezanee painting

Lisää tämän kaltaisia

5c

luonut soha osman

assi 4a

luonut Khalid Adel

الكربوهيدرات

luonut bshair khaled

Assessment and Feedback

luonut Angie Pineda

Cezanee painting

Fake

no evidence from Fluorescence for polyene emission fom the painting although it should be sensetive than UV absorption

Unkown source

cezanee didn't draw underpainting

Infrared Spectroscopy(IR)

the binder is used is animal glue binder and it is used in the nineteeth century till 1940s

this mix wasn't there till 1927

Yellow areas shows cadmium-based composed of cadmium yellow lithepone(cadnium-barium)

UV spectrum

painting showing absorbance of 0.6,so it is not like to be from 100 years ago

Substantial absorption from apolyene

Authentic

XRF(X ray fluorescence)

the pigment were known before and during the cezanee time

elemental compositions of the painting match the composition of pigment during 1839-1906

Fluorenscence data

Made in the same studio

use the same orange pigments(very similar)

green areas in the trees and orange are as bright as Cezanee paintings

Art historians

His paintings weren't from the nature but scratching in his studio

painted in late 1880s

It gives the feeling of Cezanee

the painting is similar to one of Cezanee workings

unsigned and many of cezanee paintings weren't signed

Polyenes could be contaminated caused by soot or burning lamp