Europe 1450 - 1750 Malleus Maleficarum

Lisää tämän kaltaisia

PRESENTER: HANIS NATASHA BT NOR AFINDI 29DHF18F2004 MAHYUDDIN BIN ABDULLAH 29DHF18F2002 MUHAMMAD SHAH ASRUL BIN SHAHARUDDIN 29DHF18F2028

luonut anis tasha

HOW DOES DIALOGUE EMPOWER US TO LIVE BY THE GOLDEN RULE

luonut Emily Ferreira

tesina

luonut antony abbatiello

Europe: 1450-1750: Malleus Maleficarum

luonut Mackenzie Loveys

Europe 1450 - 1750 Malleus Maleficarum

How does the author communicate ideas?

The authors use well detailed paragraphs to get their point across, while taking advantage of an already existing superstition and peoples hostility and value of women at the time.

Who wrote it? Why

Written by Heinrich Kramer and James Sprenger, two German monks, to guide others on how to identify witches for prosecution.

What does it look like?

The Malleus Maleficarum is a very well-detailed and lengthy book on the topic of witches, organized well and set up to be clearly understood by the readers at the time. Implying that the authors believe the information is critical.

What does it reveal about the values and beliefs of the past?

The impact of the text revealed how gullible and over-dramatic people were at the time when one insane idea took over the minds of millions, causing them to take life-changing actions. It even hints at how people thought of women at the time, where even without proper evidence or reasoning, they did not hesitate to kill women over an absurd superstition.

Did it result in change?

The writing had taken entirely over the minds and actions of the people at the time leading to many thousands of deaths of most likely innocent civilians, particularly women, for "witchcraft".

Which questions can this source help me answer? Which can it not?

It helps me understand the importance of empirical evidence and proof when making a claim, as well as how vital removing bias is. It does not help me understand where this original demonization of women stems from and why such an absurd idea would be created to use against thousands of women.

Whose perspectives are omitted/questioned/challenged?

Educated scholars' perspectives and primarily the suspected women's perspectives are completely ignored. The suspected and persecuted women cannot even defend themselves and are killed over superstition.

Whose perspective does it reflect

People who are blinded by their understanding of their religion and hold a deep bias against women and use deranged theories just to persecute thousands of women unjustifiably.

What ideas are left out

Ideas of how they can make the trial fair, get true evidence of the witchcraft and how they can confirm with certainty that witchcraft is indeed real and not superstition.

What are the big ideas?

That there are people, primarily women, who have special powers and are a danger to all of mankind and must be gotten rid of immediately as they are from the devil.