a kholoud hassany 18 éve
762
Karl Popper
Karl Popper
but pysical theories are free of immunizing and exclude conceivable possibilities
marxism and psychoanalysis are meta physical
Psychoanalysis was ammune to start with strategy and emained so
no longer a science, broke accepting falsification
Marxism was ascience, refuted ,clashed with its predictions
make adistinction:physical and meta physical theroies
the demarcation between science and non science
are tested, refuted and clashed with reality
bold scientific conjectures
but it had some steps 2 the truth
his predictions contradicted Newton
bold,not the truth that decidd the theory
regard his theory as refuted, and it was false
led Popper to the philosophy of science
Einestein's theory of graviation
Kepler
they approximate to truth but they r not true
three laws of planetary motion
detailed predictions of the apperances
they made minor predictions(scientific)
they didnt predict new observable appearences(un scientifc)
the sun was on the center, but it is false
rejected hidden reality behind the appearence
was bold as it clashed with all then accepted views
copernicus's,Aristarchus's conjecture
they try first to find not being wrong
daring if they take a risk of being false
new and daring conjectures
His picture of men of bold ideas
object to his theory of truth
many great scientific changes didn't come through falsification
the opinion of the scientists
rejected to the claims of scientists of seeking truth
said that a scientific statement must be falsifiable
tried to identify the nature of truth
a philosopher
