Categories: All - executive - bureaucracy - powers - legislative

by Tudor Spaisy 4 days ago

110

EU bureaucracy

The decision-making process within the European Union is complex and multifaceted, involving various bodies and procedures that have evolved over time. Since the Maastricht Treaty, executive functions have gradually increased, even though legislative powers have shifted, particularly with the co-decision process involving the European Parliament.

EU bureaucracy

Committees discuss the proposed legislation and in plenaries, MEPs vote for them

Chestii în plus pe care nu știu unde să le pun pe hartă

Arguments pro/contra Council presidency system

Strengths/Weaknesses of EuCo

And frequency of meetings
And approaches to EuCo presidency (meek vs. bold)

Powers over time

Forum for exchange

That role now belongs to EuCo (though they don`t mind about it, since they don`t have that burden anymore)
Used to be where history-making decisions were made

Gradually increased executive functions (since the Maastrich Treaty)

Even though they lost legislative power (co-decision with EP)

Spitzenkandidat system

Informal (that`s why it wasn`t used in 2019 and people haven`t trusted it since)

The political group in the EP with most votes appoints the Commission`s president

To do this, they need unanimity

That`s why in many cases they just stay silent

Still, it has little power over the Council, and no power over EuCo

These groups are: EEP, S&D, RE, the Greens/EFA, the Left/NGL, PfE, ESN

Basically, the representant of the EP when discussing with other institutions on specific laws

EU bureaucracy

EP

President of the EP

Directs all activities of the EP

Represents the EP in other EU institutions and abroad

Chairs plenary sessions

Elected for 2.5 years, unlimited renewability

Rapporteurs

Handles discussions in the responsible committee and in the plenary

Leads negotiations with other institutions

The person responsible for handling legislative proposals, reports and opinions given by the EP

Selected by European party groups and elected by MEPs

Semi-plenaries

Luxembourg

Plenaries

Strassburg

Standing committees

60-80 members each (22 of them); meet in Brussels

Elections and electoral systems
Party politics

Political groups in the EP

Have EP funding

>=23 MEPs

Coordinate the activity of affiliated parties in EP committees and plenary

Transnational political parties/federations

Loosely organised entities with little resources (ex. ALDE)

General election system: proportional representation

Each state has its own electoral thresholds and minimum age requirements for candidates

With variations: closed lists, preferential voting, single transferrable vote (STV), multiple constituencies

How many MEPs each country sends is decided by degressive proportionality

Smaller states have fewer members, but a larger state`s MEP represents more people than a smaller state`s

MEPs elected every 5 years

Few parties have pan-European elections

Politicians don`t worry about helping the EU, but about how they can win the election (ex. "I`ll go to the EP to modernise our education system!" But the EP doesn`t have that power

EP elections are second-order polls (less important than national elections)

Before 1979, they were appointed by national parliaments

Control and supervision of the executive

Written and oral questions to the Commission, the ECB and other EU agencies

Annual budgetary powers (makes sure the EU doesn`t misuse it`s budget)

Special and inquiry committees (also glonk)

Can dismiss the College (by motion of censure with 2/3 majority)

Elects the Commission`s president (after proposal by EuCo) and the College of commissioners

Excluded from deliberations on MFFs (multiannual financial frameworks)

MFFs set out the annual ceilings of expenditure that can be spent on different policy areas

Co-decides the budget with the Council

None (Glonk)

Can veto a legislation proposal as a whole in the consent procedure (but can`t propose amendments)

Gives non-binding opinion in consultation procedure

Co-decides with Council in OLP (ordinary legislative procedure)

EuCo

President of EuCo

Responsibilities

Ensure external representation of the EU

Facilitate cohesion and consensus within EuCo

Ensure the continuity of the work of the EuCo

Chair EuCo meetings

Post created in 2009; 2.5 years, renewable once

Heads of state/govt. + President of the Commission

Before the Lisbon treaty (2009), there were 2 tiers of membership; because of enlargement, they got rid of tier 2

Tier 2: Ministers + one other commissioner

Tier 1: Heads of state/govt. +Commission president

Topics covered in meetings
Specific internal policy issues

Sensitive matters where the EuCo has to give clearance (or even decide)

External relations

Issue formal declarations on ongoing events

Formal role to identify the EU`s strategic interests in foreign and security policy

Overlapping role with the High Representative of the Council and the Commission president

Enlargements

Establishing criteria for joining the EU (ex. Copenhagen criteria)

Economic/Monetary policy

Responding to crises (ex. Covid, Euro Crisis)

Constitutional/Institutional affairs

Institutional (appointing)

(Nominating) Commission president

President of ECB

High Representative of the Council

Its own President

Constitutional

Preparation for intergovt. meetings (IGCs), which lead to treaty reform (ex. Maastricht/Nice treaties)

Evolution of the EU

Sets out policy frameworks in different fields

Forum at the highest level
Receives contentious matters from other institutions (mainly the Council)

These matters are too sensitive/too political for others to agree on

Provides guidelines to others

= Doesn`t do things directly, but tells other what to do

History-making decisions

Manages crises

Negotiates EU treaties

History
Created in 1974, but informal until SEA (1986)

Got more power over time and now it`s like a board of directors

Commission

Directorates general (one for each commissioner)

Coordinated by the Secretariat-General

They can overlap though

College of Commissioners

1 commissioner/state

Appointment procedure:

6. Council appoints the accepted College by QMV

5. EP votes by simple majority on the College as a whole

4. EP holds confirmation hearings with each candidate (and can also reject them)

3. The Council adopts the full list of commissioners

2. President appoints 1 per member and gives them portfolios (each commissioner has a different one)

1. Each state suggests 1-2 candidates

President

Appointment

2. EP accepts/rejects (has never rejected)

1. EuCo proposes a candidate (voted by QMV)

Functions

Allocates commissioners` portfolios

Lays guidelines for the College

Manages/Oversees its implementation

Proposes 7-year EU budget

Represents the EU externally

In trade and enlargement negotiations

Enforces EU law

Can fine corporations

Can take states to court for not complying

Initiates/Proposes new policies

Council of the EU

Decision-making procedures
Informal

Always a preference for consensus

Helps avoid public disunity

Formal

Simple majority

Used for procedural issues

QMV

Based on a double majority

Representing >65% of the EU`s population

Approval of >55% of member states

Used in most policy areas

Unanimity

Abstentions don`t impede it

Today, used in foreign and security policy, taxation and enlargement

Structure
Presidency

Its task is to ensure:

Sound law-making

Cooperation between states and between EU bodies

Continuity of the agenda

Mediating functions: key role in setting agendas, in setting the pace and in foreign deals

Rotates between groups of 3 member states on an 18-month basis (6-months each)

Exception: Foreign Affairs department, whose presidency is held by the High Representative

5 year term, appointed by EuCo

General Secretariat

Tasked to ensure continuity and coordination in Council proceedings (ex. monitor meetings, translate etc.) (basically, the backstage job)

10 departments, each for a certain policy

How these levels work

5. If they agree, the proposal passes/If not, it goes back to lvl 3 (for revision)

About only 10% of proposals reach lvl 1

4. If COREPER agrees, the proposal passes/If not it goes to the ministers (lvl 1)

3. If they agree, the proposal passes/If not, it goes to COREPER (lvl 2)

2. Working groups and committees (lvl 3) decide on it

1. Proposal comes from the Commission

Each department has 3 levels of meetings

3. Committees and working groups

Working groups examine Commission proposals (most technical work is done here)

Aprox. 150 committees for different policies (some very specific, some broad)

2. COREPER (Committee of Permanent Representatives)

Filter between lvl 3 and lvl 1

Prepares ministerial meetings

Senior committees (from lvl 3) made lvl 2 decline in influence

Preparation includes whether matters should be A or B-points

B-points = not yet

A-points = already discussed and agreed upon

2 formations: COREPER 1 and COREPER 2

COREPER 2: high-politics

COREPER 1: routine low politics

All states have a permanent representative at Brussels (like an ambassador)

1. The ministers

Bring together relevant ministers from members (accompanied by advisers)

Powers
Mediating

Finds compromises between national govts., and between EU institutions

Budgetary

Co-decides budget with EP

Executive

Economic affairs

Sanctions members for exceeding budgetary deficit

Foreign and security policy

Takes decisions with immediate executive implications (ex. sanctions on Russia)

Single market

Works with the Commission on technical decisions (ex. regulating chemicals in food)

Legislative

Institutional triangle: EuCo proposes law, Council and EP co-decide

Deciosion-making on legislation

Non-binding: just advice where EU has shared/exclusive competencies

Binding: co-decides with EP