Assessing Credibility of Sources

Mere som dette

T.O.A.D.S.

af Lakota Gilson

Cool map

af Orlov Stepan

CVs

af Andrew Bowen

95 thesis

af Valery MacLean

Assessing Credibility of Sources

Does the author use a variety of sources when constructing their argument?

Does the author include multiple perspectives?

Are there any perspectives that are left out?

What relevant qualifications or experience does the author have?

Is the author's expertise connected to the subject?

What are other Historians saying about the author?

What is the general consensus among historians about the author's reliability?

Have other historians cited the author's work in their research?

Are there any criticisms or controversies surrounding the author?

Do other historians agree with the author's arguments?

Is the author well-respected among historians?

Who supports the author's credibility as a historian?

Positive or negative opinions about the author's work?

Are there any conflicting views on the author's credibility?

Does the author present alternative conclusions?

Are conflicting viewpoints discussed in the article?

What is the purpose of the source?

or provide evidence

entertain

persuade

How might the purpose of the source affect the content?

Does the author cite their research?

in-text citations are provided

Are the sources cited by the author reliable?