Climate Change CIVICS

Więcej takich

Money

przez Samuel Anderson-McCoy

HISTORY- CHAPTER 6

przez Ashleigh Hazra

Great Economists Concept Map

przez Andrew Lee

Hero's Journey In The Alchemist (Archetypal Theory)

przez Adam Anderson

if not caused by human actions then humans shouldn't sacrifice to reverse natural change

Climate Change CIVICS

SPEAKER ANOTE TANG

believes that bigger countries need to cut more

bigger countries will suffer most financially

bigger countries will have to sacrifice more

hesitant; financial wealth and current industry could decline

left wing

firm believer in fighting against climate change

made political decisions with climate change and environment in mind

reduced fishing industry, increasing cost for incoming vessels

COMPROMISE

countries will have to sacrifice and adapt to new changes

sacrifice of business, industry, for sake of planet's health

everyone has to come together to solve this

global issue=global solution

Immediate Action

immediate efforts should be taken

Solution

raise awareness (e.g. implement into education system)

appeal to government on this issue

elect a GOVERNMENT that will fight against this

reduce industry work; cut emissions

Real

is unnatural, needs to be reversed

climate change is real and is the result of human actions

Left Wing (Liberal)

want to focus more on cutting industry and helping the environment

Independent Responsibility

countries should decide their own efforts

risk of not knowing whether contributions are enough

not every country can make the same efforts; heavily industry reliant countries will have to give up more

countries all want to sacrifice the same amount; fear of reducing the industry and economic wealth of a country

Not Real

no change to fight climate change

continue industry development

is natural; not due to human actions

Not Severe

"will die down over time"

is not "drastic"

Right Wing (Conservative)

industry>humanity's survival