Conversational Implicature

Mais informações

ISO 9000

por m cs

INDUCCIÓN

por JHON EYDER GAVILAN ROJAS

carte mentale vierge

por Raihanatou hamidou

English as a Global Language

por Torleif Sleveland

Conversational Implicature

Examples of Violated Maxims

Flouting Manner: Using obscure or convoluted expressions (e.g., "The entity engaged in the act of purchasing" instead of "They bought").

Flouting Relation: Changing the topic (e.g., "How was work?" Answer: "The kids were great today").

Flouting Quantity: Providing less or more information than required (e.g., "Where's the car?" Answer: "In front of a building")

Flouting Quality: Sarcasm or irony (e.g., "What a beautiful day!" said during a storm).

Applications

AI Development: Important for natural language processing and conversational AI design.

Teaching: Useful for teaching language nuances to learners.

Linguistics: Enhances the study of semantics and pragmatics.

Implications for Communication

Understanding implicature is crucial for interpreting indirect or implied meanings in interactions.

Helps achieve subtlety, humor, or politeness in communication.

Conversational implicature relies on shared knowledge and context.

Types of Implicature

Particularized Implicature

Requires specific context to infer meaning (e.g., "Can you pass the salt?" implies a request rather than a question about ability).

Generalized Implicature

Does not depend on specific context (e.g., "Some people passed the test" implies not everyone passed).

Key Principles: Grice's Cooperative Principle

Maxim of Manner

Be clear, avoid ambiguity, and be orderly.

Maxim of Relation

Be relevant.

Maxim of Quantity

Provide the right amount of information—neither too much nor too little.

Maxim of Quality

Be truthful. Do not provide information that is false or unsupported by evidence.

H.P. Grice

Distinguishes between conventional (immutable) and conversational (context-dependent) implicatures.

Definition

Conversational implicature refers to the meaning derived from a speaker's utterance that is not explicitly stated but inferred based on context.