作者:zeinab kamal 14 年以前
405
New Map
Paul Cezanne's painting under scrutiny
Conclusion: there is no clear conclusion
Dr. Andersen (scientist) counter evidence
there is underdrawing and Cezanne never did underdrawings
pigment mix of yellow areas wasn't used until 1927 after Cezanne's death
used infrared spectroscopy
Dr. Pruschy (scientist) counter evidence
polyene absorbtion 0.6 instead 0.15 --> not 100 years old
used ultraviolet spectrum of a paint chip
Dr. Simpkins (scientist) pro evidence
the fluorescence data support attribution to Cézanne
trees and rooftop similiar to Cezanna painting Gardanne
Dr. Montoya (scientist) pro evidence
however, can be faked by a material scientist
compositions of pigments available during Cézanne's time
used x-ray fluorescence
Dr. Marden (historian) pro evidence
characteristic of his constructivist phase late 1880s
same brushwork
similiar to a Cezanne at the Barnes foundation
4 scientists from spectrotech, Edgar, Dr. Marden and Mr. Wandless investigated
Is fake or not?