作者：Khaled Mohsen 13 年以前
362
Assi 4a
Is it a Cézanne painting?
Dr. Pruschy
although result not necessary true because polyene is not independant on environmental conditions.
result was painting is not made hundred years ago
tested substantial absorbance of polyene in paint
Dr.Simpkins
although no evidence for polyene emission from the painting
results supported an attribution to Cézanne
examined fluorescence from surface of painting using waves
Dr. Andersen
result not sure, another technique is needed to proof presence of barium and cadmium
result was might not be a Cézanne at all
tested using infrared spectroscopy
Dr. Philip Marden, Dr.Wandless's trusted colleague
agreed that it is an unknown Cézanne, painted in late 1880s
said it is the most exciting painting he ever saw
Dr. Montoya
still no proof that it was painted by Cézanne himself
result original painting composed of pigments available Cézanne's time
examined elemental composition of samples from different colored areas
Edgar Collins
Interested in finding undiscovered artwork
Dropped out of graduate school in 1988
Has been interested in art since he was young
Dr. Wandless, curator of Metropolitan Museum
arranged for scientists at Spectrotech to examine the painting
refused allowing the painting in the exhibit before making sure it is not fake
Edgar's closest friend Dmitri
admitted that it looked authentic
considered the existence of a new Cézanne implausible
