Assi 4a

Ver más

iis

por Behnam shiri

Communication Technology

por Sayed Rami

Auth

por Ivan Kayzer

Matheus Freitas

por Matheus Freitas

Is it a Cézanne painting?

Dr. Pruschy

although result not necessary true because polyene is not independant on environmental conditions.

result was painting is not made hundred years ago

tested substantial absorbance of polyene in paint

Dr.Simpkins

although no evidence for polyene emission from the painting

results supported an attribution to Cézanne

examined fluorescence from surface of painting using waves

Dr. Andersen

result not sure, another technique is needed to proof presence of barium and cadmium

result was might not be a Cézanne at all

tested using infrared spectroscopy

Dr. Philip Marden, Dr.Wandless's trusted colleague

agreed that it is an unknown Cézanne, painted in late 1880s

said it is the most exciting painting he ever saw

Dr. Montoya

still no proof that it was painted by Cézanne himself

result original painting composed of pigments available Cézanne's time

examined elemental composition of samples from different colored areas

Edgar Collins

Interested in finding undiscovered artwork

Dropped out of graduate school in 1988

Has been interested in art since he was young

Dr. Wandless, curator of Metropolitan Museum

arranged for scientists at Spectrotech to examine the painting

refused allowing the painting in the exhibit before making sure it is not fake

Edgar's closest friend Dmitri

admitted that it looked authentic

considered the existence of a new Cézanne implausible